By Karen


Categories: Anti-ageing cream deception, DNA Damage, unassessed ingredients

Tags: , , , , , ,

Moisturisers with Sunscreen, Not as Effective as You May Think!

Motivated by promises of anti ageing by protecting the skin from the sun, many women choose a daily moisturiser cream with a sunscreen incorporated into the formula.

Many products display a SPF (sun protection factor) and make claims they will protect the skin from sun exposure, although there are no regulation guidelines for testing and labeling of UVA protection in skin care. Therefore, the degree of protection in these creams is unknown.

Consumers believe they are protected by applying a sunscreen moisturiser, but are unaware the SPF value does not reflect the entire UV spectrum.
UVB light rays are blocked by glass, such as windows, while UVA penetrates window glass.

Recently, scientists’ purchased 29 moisturising sunscreens, chosen from the most popular products sold on Amazon.  They tested the active ingredients to determine the level of UVA protection that could be expected from the products.

Although all creams tested claimed to give broad-spectrum protection of UVB as well as UVA light, it was found that not one of the products offered sufficient long wave UVA protection.

The products varied in price from $3 to $65 an ounce; the most expensive was the least effective.  The active ingredient avobenzone needs the chemical octocrylene to keep it stable and to prevent it from breaking down in sunlight, rendering it ineffective.

Of 16 of the products containing avobenzone, only 3 had sufficient octocrylene to maintain stability. When sunlight destabilizes avobenzone, it breaks down into unknown chemicals. According the Environmental Working Group’s ‘cosmetic safety data base’, this chemical has many safety data gaps; may be linked to cancer, may be linked to allergies and could damage DNA.

Six of the day creams contained no active ingredients at all for protection of UV-A1. Seven of the remaining 23 products contained zinc as the protecting ingredient. Only 3 had greater than 3% and researchers stated more than 5% was required to provide ‘adequate’ protection.

It appears many women are trusting products to protect them against sun damage without the knowledge that their choices are ineffective.

It pays to read the labels on the products you choose and maybe even do some research to ensure you are getting what you pay for.

To ensure your products are potent, pure and fresh, choose from the range at www.vieworganic.com

Comment Feed

3 Responses

  1. Even if your moisturizer had all the protection talked about in this article, sunscreen is only effective within 2 hours of application. Why have my daily moisturizer with SPF – which I apply at 6am only to have it ineffective at 8am? Nobody applies daily moisturizer all day long. Thats crazy.

    My point is they products imply it will last all day.

  2. The chemicals that are the sun screen in most moisturisers actually cause more harm as they degenerate and damage the cell’s DNA when exposed to UV light! For most women who have in-door jobs, sun screen moisturisers are a waste of time and more often than not, create more problems than they solve.

Some HTML is OK

or, reply to this post via trackback.

Continuing the Discussion

  1. […] Recently, scientists’ purchased 29 moisturising sunscreens… read more… […]